SMART vs GIPTA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of SMART and GIPTA side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | SMART | GIPTA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 16.07 | 30.84 | 25.74 |
| Daily change | −6.95% | −2.10% | −5.51% |
| Market cap | TRY 512M | TRY 4.1B | TRY 3.4B |
| P/B | 1.07 | 1.16 | 2.62 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.02% | 1.95% |
| Return on equity | −9.10% | −9.37% | 4.43% |
| Free float | 93.23% | 45.46% | 38.56% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the SMART vs GIPTA comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of SMART (Smartiks Yazilim) and GIPTA (Gipta Ofis Kirtasiye) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:58. Of the 15 metrics compared, SMART leads in 6 and GIPTA leads in 9.
Highlights: Daily change: GIPTA leads (−2.10% vs −6.95%). Market cap: GIPTA leads (TRY 4.1B vs TRY 512M). P/B: SMART leads (1.07 vs 1.16). EV/EBITDA: GIPTA leads (7.35 vs 9.52). EV/Sales: SMART leads (6.01 vs 6.37). Gross margin: SMART leads (78.51% vs 46.90%). EBITDA margin (annual): SMART leads (51.21% vs 20.03%). Net margin (annual): GIPTA leads (−15.29% vs −32.00%).
Frequently asked questions
Is SMART or GIPTA cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, SMART trades at the lower multiple (1.07 vs 1.16).
Which is more profitable, SMART or GIPTA?
Annual net margin is −32.00% for SMART and −15.29% for GIPTA; return on equity is −9.10% for SMART and −9.37% for GIPTA.
Which is more leveraged, SMART or GIPTA?
The leverage ratio is 47.56 for SMART and 17.75 for GIPTA; net debt/EBITDA is 1.71 for SMART and −4.05 for GIPTA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.