LIDFA vs QNBFK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of LIDFA and QNBFK side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | LIDFA | QNBFK | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.68 | 33.96 | 9.78 |
| Daily change | −2.89% | −2.02% | −4.58% |
| Market cap | TRY 2.8B | TRY 84.9B | TRY 6.9B |
| P/E | 3.85 | 40.80 | 2.69 |
| P/B | 1.30 | 10.62 | 0.88 |
| Return on equity | 37.56% | 30.06% | 33.81% |
| Free float | 41.13% | 0.60% | 28.55% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the LIDFA vs QNBFK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of LIDFA (Lider Faktoring) and QNBFK (QNB Finansal Kiralama) side by side as of Oct 22, 2026, 18:19. Of the 7 metrics compared, LIDFA leads in 4 and QNBFK leads in 3.
Highlights: Daily change: QNBFK leads (−2.02% vs −2.89%). Market cap: QNBFK leads (TRY 84.9B vs TRY 2.8B). P/E: LIDFA leads (3.85 vs 40.80). P/B: LIDFA leads (1.30 vs 10.62). Net margin (annual): QNBFK leads (189.09% vs 70.84%). Return on assets: LIDFA leads (7.82% vs 3.77%). Return on equity: LIDFA leads (37.56% vs 30.06%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is LIDFA or QNBFK cheaper?
By P/E, LIDFA is cheaper (3.85 vs 40.80); by P/B, LIDFA trades at the lower multiple (1.30 vs 10.62).
Which is more profitable, LIDFA or QNBFK?
Annual net margin is 70.84% for LIDFA and 189.09% for QNBFK; return on equity is 37.56% for LIDFA and 30.06% for QNBFK.
Which is more leveraged, LIDFA or QNBFK?
The leverage ratio is — for LIDFA and — for QNBFK; net debt/EBITDA is — for LIDFA and — for QNBFK. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.