KUTPO vs GLRMK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KUTPO and GLRMK side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KUTPO | GLRMK | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 66.50 | 138.50 | 16.02 |
| Daily change | 1.06% | −1.77% | −1.45% |
| Market cap | TRY 2.7B | TRY 44.7B | TRY 5.5B |
| P/E | — | 11.71 | 24.39 |
| P/B | 0.60 | 1.60 | 1.01 |
| Dividend yield | 2.07% | — | 1.87% |
| Return on equity | −0.73% | 17.35% | 1.06% |
| Free float | 25.73% | 24.88% | 26.74% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KUTPO vs GLRMK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KUTPO (Kutahya Porselen) and GLRMK (Gulermak Agir Sanayi) side by side as of Sep 29, 2026, 16:58. Of the 15 metrics compared, KUTPO leads in 10 and GLRMK leads in 5.
Highlights: Daily change: KUTPO leads (1.06% vs −1.77%). Market cap: GLRMK leads (TRY 44.7B vs TRY 2.7B). P/B: KUTPO leads (0.60 vs 1.60). EV/EBITDA: KUTPO leads (4.40 vs 7.70). EV/Sales: KUTPO leads (1.32 vs 2.05). Gross margin: KUTPO leads (31.44% vs 13.29%). EBITDA margin (annual): KUTPO leads (22.68% vs 12.63%). Net margin (annual): GLRMK leads (8.37% vs −0.82%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is KUTPO or GLRMK cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 11.71); by P/B, KUTPO trades at the lower multiple (0.60 vs 1.60).
Which is more profitable, KUTPO or GLRMK?
Annual net margin is −0.82% for KUTPO and 8.37% for GLRMK; return on equity is −0.73% for KUTPO and 17.35% for GLRMK.
Which is more leveraged, KUTPO or GLRMK?
The leverage ratio is 18.09 for KUTPO and 64.52 for GLRMK; net debt/EBITDA is −0.11 for KUTPO and −0.07 for GLRMK. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.