KRSTL vs ECILC Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KRSTL and ECILC side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KRSTL | ECILC | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 7.48 | 64.00 | 10.95 |
| Daily change | −4.83% | −6.57% | −4.27% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.4B | TRY 43.9B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | 4.22 | — | 13.53 |
| P/B | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.85 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.04% | 1.23% |
| Return on equity | 17.93% | −3.08% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 88.35% | 22.02% | 32.02% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KRSTL vs ECILC Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KRSTL (Kristal Kola) and ECILC (Eczacıbaşı İlaç) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 16:54. Of the 15 metrics compared, KRSTL leads in 10 and ECILC leads in 5.
Highlights: Daily change: KRSTL leads (−4.83% vs −6.57%). Market cap: ECILC leads (TRY 43.9B vs TRY 1.4B). P/B: KRSTL leads (0.67 vs 0.68). EV/EBITDA: KRSTL leads (3.36 vs 165.19). EV/Sales: KRSTL leads (0.80 vs 9.35). Gross margin: ECILC leads (37.83% vs 13.15%). EBITDA margin (annual): KRSTL leads (14.40% vs 11.49%). Net margin (annual): KRSTL leads (10.61% vs −20.86%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is KRSTL or ECILC cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (4.22 vs —); by P/B, KRSTL trades at the lower multiple (0.67 vs 0.68).
Which is more profitable, KRSTL or ECILC?
Annual net margin is 10.61% for KRSTL and −20.86% for ECILC; return on equity is 17.93% for KRSTL and −3.08% for ECILC.
Which is more leveraged, KRSTL or ECILC?
The leverage ratio is 31.32 for KRSTL and 18.92 for ECILC; net debt/EBITDA is 0.12 for KRSTL and 1.37 for ECILC. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.