KRSTL vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KRSTL and KENT side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KRSTL | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 7.53 | 292.50 | 10.97 |
| Daily change | −4.20% | 0.86% | −4.15% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.4B | TRY 96.5B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | 4.22 | — | 13.61 |
| P/B | 0.67 | 12.48 | 0.89 |
| Return on equity | 17.93% | −13.03% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 88.35% | 0.54% | 32.02% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KRSTL vs KENT comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KRSTL (Kristal Kola) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:18. Of the 15 metrics compared, KRSTL leads in 9 and KENT leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.86% vs −4.20%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 96.5B vs TRY 1.4B). P/B: KRSTL leads (0.67 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: KRSTL leads (3.36 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: KRSTL leads (0.80 vs 11.82). Gross margin: KENT leads (14.39% vs 13.15%). EBITDA margin (annual): KRSTL leads (14.40% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): KRSTL leads (10.61% vs −6.14%).
Frequently asked questions
Is KRSTL or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (4.22 vs —); by P/B, KRSTL trades at the lower multiple (0.67 vs 12.48).
Which is more profitable, KRSTL or KENT?
Annual net margin is 10.61% for KRSTL and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is 17.93% for KRSTL and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, KRSTL or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 31.32 for KRSTL and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is 0.12 for KRSTL and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.