KIMMR vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KIMMR and FROTO side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KIMMR | FROTO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 10.86 | 74.60 | 10.86 |
| Daily change | −4.15% | −2.86% | −5.55% |
| Market cap | TRY 2.6B | TRY 261.8B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | 3.79 | 8.12 | 13.64 |
| P/B | 0.52 | 1.50 | 0.86 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 3.36% | 1.23% |
| Return on equity | 15.71% | 19.65% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 26.52% | 17.66% | 32.02% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KIMMR vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KIMMR (Kim Market-Ersan Alisveris) and FROTO (Ford Otosan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:21. Of the 17 metrics compared, KIMMR leads in 11 and FROTO leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.86% vs −4.15%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 261.8B vs TRY 2.6B). P/E: KIMMR leads (3.79 vs 8.12). P/B: KIMMR leads (0.52 vs 1.50). EV/EBITDA: KIMMR leads (2.77 vs 9.18). EV/Sales: KIMMR leads (0.40 vs 0.89). Dividend yield: FROTO leads (3.36% vs 1.29%). Gross margin: KIMMR leads (23.89% vs 6.87%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is KIMMR or FROTO cheaper?
By P/E, KIMMR is cheaper (3.79 vs 8.12); by P/B, KIMMR trades at the lower multiple (0.52 vs 1.50).
Which is more profitable, KIMMR or FROTO?
Annual net margin is 4.78% for KIMMR and 4.28% for FROTO; return on equity is 15.71% for KIMMR and 19.65% for FROTO.
Which is more leveraged, KIMMR or FROTO?
The leverage ratio is 52.09 for KIMMR and 63.37 for FROTO; net debt/EBITDA is 0.33 for KIMMR and 2.29 for FROTO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.