FROTO vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FROTO and KENT side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FROTO | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 74.60 | 281.00 | 20.30 |
| Daily change | −2.86% | −3.10% | −5.54% |
| Market cap | TRY 261.8B | TRY 92.7B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | 8.12 | — | 15.42 |
| P/B | 1.50 | 12.48 | 1.08 |
| Dividend yield | 3.36% | — | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | 19.65% | −13.03% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 17.66% | 0.54% | 34.94% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FROTO vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FROTO (Ford Otosan) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:17. Of the 15 metrics compared, FROTO leads in 10 and KENT leads in 5.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.86% vs −3.10%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 261.8B vs TRY 92.7B). P/B: FROTO leads (1.50 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 11.82). Gross margin: KENT leads (14.39% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): FROTO leads (6.30% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): FROTO leads (4.28% vs −6.14%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FROTO or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (8.12 vs —); by P/B, FROTO trades at the lower multiple (1.50 vs 12.48).
Which is more profitable, FROTO or KENT?
Annual net margin is 4.28% for FROTO and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is 19.65% for FROTO and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, FROTO or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 63.37 for FROTO and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is 2.29 for FROTO and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.