KENT vs TERA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KENT and TERA side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KENT | TERA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 272.75 | 78.30 | 10.67 |
| Daily change | 0.46% | −9.95% | −0.98% |
| Market cap | TRY 90B | TRY 54.8B | TRY 3.9B |
| P/E | — | 0.93 | 13.62 |
| P/B | 11.69 | 0.66 | 0.84 |
| Return on equity | −13.03% | 107.06% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 0.54% | 31.11% | 32.02% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KENT vs TERA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KENT (Kent Gida) and TERA (Tera Yatirim Menkul Degerler) side by side as of Sep 29, 2026, 14:00. Of the 14 metrics compared, KENT leads in 6 and TERA leads in 8.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.46% vs −9.95%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 90B vs TRY 54.8B). P/B: TERA leads (0.66 vs 11.69). EV/EBITDA: KENT leads (258.83 vs −1.53). EV/Sales: KENT leads (11.06 vs −0.76). Gross margin: TERA leads (22.43% vs 14.39%). EBITDA margin (annual): TERA leads (11.99% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): TERA leads (14.06% vs −6.14%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is KENT or TERA cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 0.93); by P/B, TERA trades at the lower multiple (11.69 vs 0.66).
Which is more profitable, KENT or TERA?
Annual net margin is −6.14% for KENT and 14.06% for TERA; return on equity is −13.03% for KENT and 107.06% for TERA.
Which is more leveraged, KENT or TERA?
The leverage ratio is 43.40 for KENT and 63.33 for TERA; net debt/EBITDA is 0.00 for KENT and −2.61 for TERA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.