KENT vs OBAMS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KENT and OBAMS side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KENT | OBAMS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 233.00 | 3.47 | 8.92 |
| Daily change | −5.86% | −1.14% | −3.11% |
| Market cap | TRY 76.9B | TRY 10B | TRY 3.1B |
| P/B | 10.65 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.51% | 1.29% |
| Return on equity | −13.03% | −17.50% | −0.41% |
| Free float | 0.54% | 25.85% | 31.43% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KENT vs OBAMS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KENT (Kent Gida) and OBAMS (Oba Makarnacilik) side by side as of Oct 22, 2026, 18:19. Of the 15 metrics compared, KENT leads in 6 and OBAMS leads in 9.
Highlights: Daily change: OBAMS leads (−1.14% vs −5.86%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 76.9B vs TRY 10B). P/B: OBAMS leads (0.78 vs 10.65). EV/EBITDA: OBAMS leads (13.16 vs 235.95). EV/Sales: OBAMS leads (0.50 vs 10.09). Gross margin: KENT leads (14.39% vs 10.11%). EBITDA margin (annual): KENT leads (5.65% vs 5.54%). Net margin (annual): KENT leads (−6.14% vs −9.84%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is KENT or OBAMS cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, OBAMS trades at the lower multiple (10.65 vs 0.78).
Which is more profitable, KENT or OBAMS?
Annual net margin is −6.14% for KENT and −9.84% for OBAMS; return on equity is −13.03% for KENT and −17.50% for OBAMS.
Which is more leveraged, KENT or OBAMS?
The leverage ratio is 43.40 for KENT and 17.65 for OBAMS; net debt/EBITDA is 0.00 for KENT and −3.21 for OBAMS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.