CCOLA vs OBAMS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CCOLA and OBAMS side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CCOLA | OBAMS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 74.20 | 3.47 | 8.92 |
| Daily change | −3.26% | −1.14% | −3.11% |
| Market cap | TRY 207.6B | TRY 10B | TRY 3.1B |
| P/E | 9.75 | — | 11.75 |
| P/B | 2.34 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| Dividend yield | 1.63% | 0.51% | 1.29% |
| Return on equity | 26.77% | −17.50% | −0.41% |
| Free float | 29.31% | 25.85% | 31.43% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CCOLA vs OBAMS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CCOLA (Coca Cola Icecek) and OBAMS (Oba Makarnacilik) side by side as of Oct 22, 2026, 18:19. Of the 16 metrics compared, CCOLA leads in 8 and OBAMS leads in 8.
Highlights: Daily change: OBAMS leads (−1.14% vs −3.26%). Market cap: CCOLA leads (TRY 207.6B vs TRY 10B). P/B: OBAMS leads (0.78 vs 2.34). EV/EBITDA: CCOLA leads (6.17 vs 13.16). EV/Sales: OBAMS leads (0.50 vs 1.98). Dividend yield: CCOLA leads (1.63% vs 0.51%). Gross margin: CCOLA leads (37.38% vs 10.11%). EBITDA margin (annual): CCOLA leads (26.55% vs 5.54%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CCOLA or OBAMS cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (9.75 vs —); by P/B, OBAMS trades at the lower multiple (2.34 vs 0.78).
Which is more profitable, CCOLA or OBAMS?
Annual net margin is 11.22% for CCOLA and −9.84% for OBAMS; return on equity is 26.77% for CCOLA and −17.50% for OBAMS.
Which is more leveraged, CCOLA or OBAMS?
The leverage ratio is 56.45 for CCOLA and 17.65 for OBAMS; net debt/EBITDA is 0.57 for CCOLA and −3.21 for OBAMS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.