IMASM vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of IMASM and TUPRS side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | IMASM | TUPRS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.55 | 399.50 | 20.65 |
| Daily change | −4.32% | −1.60% | −4.26% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.4B | TRY 769.8B | TRY 3.8B |
| P/E | — | 10.75 | 16.24 |
| P/B | 0.43 | 1.72 | 1.17 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.00% | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | −14.10% | 18.20% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 70.18% | 49.42% | 34.94% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the IMASM vs TUPRS comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of IMASM (Imas Makina) and TUPRS (Tüpraş) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:20. Of the 15 metrics compared, IMASM leads in 4 and TUPRS leads in 11.
Highlights: Daily change: TUPRS leads (−1.60% vs −4.32%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 769.8B vs TRY 1.4B). P/B: IMASM leads (0.43 vs 1.72). EV/EBITDA: TUPRS leads (6.43 vs 12.89). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.98 vs 1.67). Gross margin: IMASM leads (39.29% vs 12.69%). EBITDA margin (annual): IMASM leads (12.61% vs 10.32%). Net margin (annual): TUPRS leads (7.07% vs −17.40%).
Frequently asked questions
Is IMASM or TUPRS cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 10.75); by P/B, IMASM trades at the lower multiple (0.43 vs 1.72).
Which is more profitable, IMASM or TUPRS?
Annual net margin is −17.40% for IMASM and 7.07% for TUPRS; return on equity is −14.10% for IMASM and 18.20% for TUPRS.
Which is more leveraged, IMASM or TUPRS?
The leverage ratio is 44.90 for IMASM and 46.13 for TUPRS; net debt/EBITDA is 1.83 for IMASM and −1.23 for TUPRS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.