IMASM vs TRGYO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of IMASM and TRGYO side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | IMASM | TRGYO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.55 | 90.15 | 20.57 |
| Daily change | −4.32% | −1.15% | −4.38% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.4B | TRY 90.2B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | — | 9.66 | 16.24 |
| P/B | 0.43 | 0.59 | 1.17 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.27% | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | −14.10% | 6.77% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 70.18% | 20.38% | 34.94% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the IMASM vs TRGYO comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of IMASM (Imas Makina) and TRGYO (Torunlar GMYO) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:52. Of the 13 metrics compared, IMASM leads in 2 and TRGYO leads in 11.
Highlights: Daily change: TRGYO leads (−1.15% vs −4.32%). Market cap: TRGYO leads (TRY 90.2B vs TRY 1.4B). P/B: IMASM leads (0.43 vs 0.59). EV/EBITDA: TRGYO leads (6.97 vs 12.89). EV/Sales: IMASM leads (1.67 vs 9.98). Gross margin: TRGYO leads (75.28% vs 39.29%). EBITDA margin (annual): TRGYO leads (50.05% vs 12.61%). Net margin (annual): TRGYO leads (51.70% vs −17.40%).
Frequently asked questions
Is IMASM or TRGYO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 9.66); by P/B, IMASM trades at the lower multiple (0.43 vs 0.59).
Which is more profitable, IMASM or TRGYO?
Annual net margin is −17.40% for IMASM and 51.70% for TRGYO; return on equity is −14.10% for IMASM and 6.77% for TRGYO.
Which is more leveraged, IMASM or TRGYO?
The leverage ratio is 44.90 for IMASM and 22.02 for TRGYO; net debt/EBITDA is 1.83 for IMASM and — for TRGYO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.