IMASM vs GIPTA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of IMASM and GIPTA side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | IMASM | GIPTA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.55 | 31.76 | 20.57 |
| Daily change | −4.32% | 0.83% | −4.38% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.4B | TRY 4.2B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/B | 0.43 | 1.16 | 1.17 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.02% | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | −14.10% | −9.37% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 70.18% | 45.46% | 34.94% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the IMASM vs GIPTA comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of IMASM (Imas Makina) and GIPTA (Gipta Ofis Kirtasiye) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:52. Of the 15 metrics compared, IMASM leads in 2 and GIPTA leads in 13.
Highlights: Daily change: GIPTA leads (0.83% vs −4.32%). Market cap: GIPTA leads (TRY 4.2B vs TRY 1.4B). P/B: IMASM leads (0.43 vs 1.16). EV/EBITDA: GIPTA leads (7.35 vs 12.89). EV/Sales: IMASM leads (1.67 vs 6.37). Gross margin: GIPTA leads (46.90% vs 39.29%). EBITDA margin (annual): GIPTA leads (20.03% vs 12.61%). Net margin (annual): GIPTA leads (−15.29% vs −17.40%).
Frequently asked questions
Is IMASM or GIPTA cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, IMASM trades at the lower multiple (0.43 vs 1.16).
Which is more profitable, IMASM or GIPTA?
Annual net margin is −17.40% for IMASM and −15.29% for GIPTA; return on equity is −14.10% for IMASM and −9.37% for GIPTA.
Which is more leveraged, IMASM or GIPTA?
The leverage ratio is 44.90 for IMASM and 17.75 for GIPTA; net debt/EBITDA is 1.83 for IMASM and −4.05 for GIPTA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.