HURGZ vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of HURGZ and FROTO side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | HURGZ | FROTO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 5.70 | 75.40 | 16.26 |
| Daily change | −5.00% | −1.82% | −4.03% |
| Market cap | TRY 3.4B | TRY 264.6B | TRY 2.8B |
| P/E | — | 8.12 | 6.90 |
| P/B | 2.33 | 1.50 | 1.28 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.36% | 2.52% |
| Return on equity | −72.99% | 19.65% | −1.04% |
| Free float | 18.70% | 17.66% | 34.99% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the HURGZ vs FROTO comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of HURGZ (Hurriyet Gzt.) and FROTO (Ford Otosan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:44. Of the 14 metrics compared, HURGZ leads in 2 and FROTO leads in 12.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−1.82% vs −5.00%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 264.6B vs TRY 3.4B). P/B: FROTO leads (1.50 vs 2.33). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs −5.43). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 6.18). Gross margin: FROTO leads (6.87% vs −20.50%). EBITDA margin (annual): FROTO leads (6.30% vs −58.80%). Net margin (annual): FROTO leads (4.28% vs −136.37%).
Frequently asked questions
Is HURGZ or FROTO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 8.12); by P/B, FROTO trades at the lower multiple (2.33 vs 1.50).
Which is more profitable, HURGZ or FROTO?
Annual net margin is −136.37% for HURGZ and 4.28% for FROTO; return on equity is −72.99% for HURGZ and 19.65% for FROTO.
Which is more leveraged, HURGZ or FROTO?
The leverage ratio is 69.32 for HURGZ and 63.37 for FROTO; net debt/EBITDA is — for HURGZ and 2.29 for FROTO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.