HURGZ vs GIPTA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of HURGZ and GIPTA side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | HURGZ | GIPTA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 5.71 | 31.78 | 16.18 |
| Daily change | −4.83% | 0.89% | −4.37% |
| Market cap | TRY 3.4B | TRY 4.2B | TRY 2.7B |
| P/B | 2.33 | 1.16 | 1.28 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.02% | 2.52% |
| Return on equity | −72.99% | −9.37% | −1.04% |
| Free float | 18.70% | 45.46% | 34.99% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the HURGZ vs GIPTA comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of HURGZ (Hurriyet Gzt.) and GIPTA (Gipta Ofis Kirtasiye) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:53. Of the 14 metrics compared, HURGZ leads in 2 and GIPTA leads in 12.
Highlights: Daily change: GIPTA leads (0.89% vs −4.83%). Market cap: GIPTA leads (TRY 4.2B vs TRY 3.4B). P/B: GIPTA leads (1.16 vs 2.33). EV/EBITDA: GIPTA leads (7.35 vs −5.43). EV/Sales: HURGZ leads (6.18 vs 6.37). Gross margin: GIPTA leads (46.90% vs −20.50%). EBITDA margin (annual): GIPTA leads (20.03% vs −58.80%). Net margin (annual): GIPTA leads (−15.29% vs −136.37%).
Frequently asked questions
Is HURGZ or GIPTA cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, GIPTA trades at the lower multiple (2.33 vs 1.16).
Which is more profitable, HURGZ or GIPTA?
Annual net margin is −136.37% for HURGZ and −15.29% for GIPTA; return on equity is −72.99% for HURGZ and −9.37% for GIPTA.
Which is more leveraged, HURGZ or GIPTA?
The leverage ratio is 69.32 for HURGZ and 17.75 for GIPTA; net debt/EBITDA is — for HURGZ and −4.05 for GIPTA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.