GUBRF vs LOGO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GUBRF and LOGO side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GUBRF | LOGO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 435.00 | 136.40 | 18.72 |
| Daily change | −5.02% | −2.57% | −6.24% |
| Market cap | TRY 145.3B | TRY 13B | TRY 4.3B |
| P/E | 19.22 | 14.96 | 17.35 |
| P/B | 3.89 | 3.00 | 1.09 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.61% | 0.90% |
| Return on equity | 23.87% | 22.33% | 1.78% |
| Free float | 20.28% | 61.32% | 37.21% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GUBRF vs LOGO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) and LOGO (Logo Yazilim) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:16. Of the 16 metrics compared, GUBRF leads in 6 and LOGO leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: LOGO leads (−2.57% vs −5.02%). Market cap: GUBRF leads (TRY 145.3B vs TRY 13B). P/E: LOGO leads (14.96 vs 19.22). P/B: LOGO leads (3.00 vs 3.89). EV/EBITDA: LOGO leads (6.06 vs 11.70). EV/Sales: LOGO leads (3.63 vs 3.90). Gross margin: LOGO leads (97.44% vs 26.69%). EBITDA margin (annual): LOGO leads (48.14% vs 22.84%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GUBRF or LOGO cheaper?
By P/E, LOGO is cheaper (19.22 vs 14.96); by P/B, LOGO trades at the lower multiple (3.89 vs 3.00).
Which is more profitable, GUBRF or LOGO?
Annual net margin is 13.44% for GUBRF and 14.84% for LOGO; return on equity is 23.87% for GUBRF and 22.33% for LOGO.
Which is more leveraged, GUBRF or LOGO?
The leverage ratio is 41.50 for GUBRF and 49.02 for LOGO; net debt/EBITDA is −0.39 for GUBRF and −0.37 for LOGO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.