LOGO vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of LOGO and TUPRS side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | LOGO | TUPRS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 138.30 | 399.50 | 25.80 |
| Daily change | −1.21% | −1.60% | −5.11% |
| Market cap | TRY 13.1B | TRY 769.8B | TRY 3.5B |
| P/E | 14.96 | 10.75 | 16.47 |
| P/B | 3.00 | 1.72 | 2.62 |
| Dividend yield | 3.61% | 4.00% | 1.95% |
| Return on equity | 22.33% | 18.20% | 4.43% |
| Free float | 61.32% | 49.42% | 38.56% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the LOGO vs TUPRS comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of LOGO (Logo Yazilim) and TUPRS (Tüpraş) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:18. Of the 17 metrics compared, LOGO leads in 8 and TUPRS leads in 9.
Highlights: Daily change: LOGO leads (−1.21% vs −1.60%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 769.8B vs TRY 13.1B). P/E: TUPRS leads (10.75 vs 14.96). P/B: TUPRS leads (1.72 vs 3.00). EV/EBITDA: LOGO leads (6.06 vs 6.43). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.98 vs 3.63). Dividend yield: TUPRS leads (4.00% vs 3.61%). Gross margin: LOGO leads (97.44% vs 12.69%).
Frequently asked questions
Is LOGO or TUPRS cheaper?
By P/E, TUPRS is cheaper (14.96 vs 10.75); by P/B, TUPRS trades at the lower multiple (3.00 vs 1.72).
Which is more profitable, LOGO or TUPRS?
Annual net margin is 14.84% for LOGO and 7.07% for TUPRS; return on equity is 22.33% for LOGO and 18.20% for TUPRS.
Which is more leveraged, LOGO or TUPRS?
The leverage ratio is 49.02 for LOGO and 46.13 for TUPRS; net debt/EBITDA is −0.37 for LOGO and −1.23 for TUPRS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.