GUBRF vs IMASM Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GUBRF and IMASM side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GUBRF | IMASM | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 435.00 | 1.53 | 18.72 |
| Daily change | −5.02% | −5.56% | −6.36% |
| Market cap | TRY 145.3B | TRY 1.4B | TRY 4.3B |
| P/E | 19.22 | — | 17.35 |
| P/B | 3.89 | 0.43 | 1.09 |
| Return on equity | 23.87% | −14.10% | 1.78% |
| Free float | 20.28% | 70.18% | 37.21% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GUBRF vs IMASM Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) and IMASM (Imas Makina) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:18. Of the 15 metrics compared, GUBRF leads in 11 and IMASM leads in 4.
Highlights: Daily change: GUBRF leads (−5.02% vs −5.56%). Market cap: GUBRF leads (TRY 145.3B vs TRY 1.4B). P/B: IMASM leads (0.43 vs 3.89). EV/EBITDA: GUBRF leads (11.70 vs 12.89). EV/Sales: IMASM leads (1.67 vs 3.90). Gross margin: IMASM leads (39.29% vs 26.69%). EBITDA margin (annual): GUBRF leads (22.84% vs 12.61%). Net margin (annual): GUBRF leads (13.44% vs −17.40%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GUBRF or IMASM cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (19.22 vs —); by P/B, IMASM trades at the lower multiple (3.89 vs 0.43).
Which is more profitable, GUBRF or IMASM?
Annual net margin is 13.44% for GUBRF and −17.40% for IMASM; return on equity is 23.87% for GUBRF and −14.10% for IMASM.
Which is more leveraged, GUBRF or IMASM?
The leverage ratio is 41.50 for GUBRF and 44.90 for IMASM; net debt/EBITDA is −0.39 for GUBRF and 1.83 for IMASM. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.