FROTO vs ECILC Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FROTO and ECILC side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FROTO | ECILC | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 75.10 | 63.60 | 20.53 |
| Daily change | −2.21% | −7.15% | −4.97% |
| Market cap | TRY 263.5B | TRY 43.6B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | 8.12 | — | 15.42 |
| P/B | 1.50 | 0.68 | 1.08 |
| Dividend yield | 3.36% | 2.04% | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | 19.65% | −3.08% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 17.66% | 22.02% | 34.94% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FROTO vs ECILC Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FROTO (Ford Otosan) and ECILC (Eczacıbaşı İlaç) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 13:42. Of the 16 metrics compared, FROTO leads in 8 and ECILC leads in 8.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.21% vs −7.15%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 263.5B vs TRY 43.6B). P/B: ECILC leads (0.68 vs 1.50). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs 165.19). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 9.35). Dividend yield: FROTO leads (3.36% vs 2.04%). Gross margin: ECILC leads (37.83% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): ECILC leads (11.49% vs 6.30%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FROTO or ECILC cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (8.12 vs —); by P/B, ECILC trades at the lower multiple (1.50 vs 0.68).
Which is more profitable, FROTO or ECILC?
Annual net margin is 4.28% for FROTO and −20.86% for ECILC; return on equity is 19.65% for FROTO and −3.08% for ECILC.
Which is more leveraged, FROTO or ECILC?
The leverage ratio is 63.37 for FROTO and 18.92 for ECILC; net debt/EBITDA is 2.29 for FROTO and 1.37 for ECILC. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.