GUBRF vs CIMSA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GUBRF and CIMSA side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GUBRF | CIMSA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 435.00 | 41.98 | 18.72 |
| Daily change | −5.02% | −1.92% | −6.36% |
| Market cap | TRY 145.3B | TRY 39.7B | TRY 4.3B |
| P/E | 19.22 | 9.32 | 17.35 |
| P/B | 3.89 | 1.08 | 1.09 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.50% | 0.90% |
| Return on equity | 23.87% | 12.50% | 1.78% |
| Free float | 20.28% | 45.08% | 37.21% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GUBRF vs CIMSA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) and CIMSA (Cimsa) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:17. Of the 16 metrics compared, GUBRF leads in 11 and CIMSA leads in 5.
Highlights: Daily change: CIMSA leads (−1.92% vs −5.02%). Market cap: GUBRF leads (TRY 145.3B vs TRY 39.7B). P/E: CIMSA leads (9.32 vs 19.22). P/B: CIMSA leads (1.08 vs 3.89). EV/EBITDA: CIMSA leads (8.12 vs 11.70). EV/Sales: CIMSA leads (2.62 vs 3.90). Gross margin: GUBRF leads (26.69% vs 17.56%). EBITDA margin (annual): GUBRF leads (22.84% vs 18.96%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GUBRF or CIMSA cheaper?
By P/E, CIMSA is cheaper (19.22 vs 9.32); by P/B, CIMSA trades at the lower multiple (3.89 vs 1.08).
Which is more profitable, GUBRF or CIMSA?
Annual net margin is 13.44% for GUBRF and 9.76% for CIMSA; return on equity is 23.87% for GUBRF and 12.50% for CIMSA.
Which is more leveraged, GUBRF or CIMSA?
The leverage ratio is 41.50 for GUBRF and 52.21 for CIMSA; net debt/EBITDA is −0.39 for GUBRF and 3.11 for CIMSA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.