CIMSA vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CIMSA and TUPRS side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | CIMSA | TUPRS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 42.54 | 398.75 | 15.74 |
| Daily change | −0.61% | −1.79% | −4.62% |
| Market cap | TRY 40.2B | TRY 768.3B | TRY 5.6B |
| P/E | 9.32 | 10.75 | 27.37 |
| P/B | 1.08 | 1.72 | 1.07 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | 4.00% | 1.87% |
| Return on equity | 12.50% | 18.20% | 1.06% |
| Free float | 45.08% | 49.42% | 26.74% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the CIMSA vs TUPRS comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CIMSA (Cimsa) and TUPRS (Tüpraş) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:31. Of the 17 metrics compared, CIMSA leads in 6 and TUPRS leads in 11.
Highlights: Daily change: CIMSA leads (−0.61% vs −1.79%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 768.3B vs TRY 40.2B). P/E: CIMSA leads (9.32 vs 10.75). P/B: CIMSA leads (1.08 vs 1.72). EV/EBITDA: TUPRS leads (6.43 vs 8.12). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.98 vs 2.62). Dividend yield: TUPRS leads (4.00% vs 1.50%). Gross margin: CIMSA leads (17.56% vs 12.69%).
Frequently asked questions
Is CIMSA or TUPRS cheaper?
By P/E, CIMSA is cheaper (9.32 vs 10.75); by P/B, CIMSA trades at the lower multiple (1.08 vs 1.72).
Which is more profitable, CIMSA or TUPRS?
Annual net margin is 9.76% for CIMSA and 7.07% for TUPRS; return on equity is 12.50% for CIMSA and 18.20% for TUPRS.
Which is more leveraged, CIMSA or TUPRS?
The leverage ratio is 52.21 for CIMSA and 46.13 for TUPRS; net debt/EBITDA is 3.11 for CIMSA and −1.23 for TUPRS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.