GMTAS vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GMTAS and TUPRS side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GMTAS | TUPRS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 48.40 | 399.75 | 10.97 |
| Daily change | −2.42% | −1.54% | −4.06% |
| Market cap | TRY 14.5B | TRY 770.2B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | — | 10.75 | 13.61 |
| P/B | 3.23 | 1.72 | 0.89 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.00% | 1.23% |
| Return on equity | −2.83% | 18.20% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 86.78% | 49.42% | 32.02% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GMTAS vs TUPRS comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GMTAS (Gimat Magazacilik) and TUPRS (Tüpraş) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:21. Of the 12 metrics compared, GMTAS leads in 4 and TUPRS leads in 8.
Highlights: Daily change: TUPRS leads (−1.54% vs −2.42%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 770.2B vs TRY 14.5B). P/B: TUPRS leads (1.72 vs 3.23). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.98 vs 29.19). Gross margin: GMTAS leads (20.91% vs 12.69%). EBITDA margin (annual): GMTAS leads (163.83% vs 10.32%). Net margin (annual): TUPRS leads (7.07% vs −2.04%). Return on assets: TUPRS leads (9.90% vs −2.30%).
Frequently asked questions
Is GMTAS or TUPRS cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 10.75); by P/B, TUPRS trades at the lower multiple (3.23 vs 1.72).
Which is more profitable, GMTAS or TUPRS?
Annual net margin is −2.04% for GMTAS and 7.07% for TUPRS; return on equity is −2.83% for GMTAS and 18.20% for TUPRS.
Which is more leveraged, GMTAS or TUPRS?
The leverage ratio is 17.80 for GMTAS and 46.13 for TUPRS; net debt/EBITDA is — for GMTAS and −1.23 for TUPRS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.