GMTAS vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GMTAS and KENT side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GMTAS | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 46.92 | 289.00 | 10.86 |
| Daily change | −5.40% | −0.34% | −5.24% |
| Market cap | TRY 14.1B | TRY 95.4B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/B | 3.23 | 12.48 | 0.86 |
| Return on equity | −2.83% | −13.03% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 86.78% | 0.54% | 32.02% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GMTAS vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GMTAS (Gimat Magazacilik) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 13:47. Of the 12 metrics compared, GMTAS leads in 8 and KENT leads in 4.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (−0.34% vs −5.40%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 95.4B vs TRY 14.1B). P/B: GMTAS leads (3.23 vs 12.48). EV/Sales: KENT leads (11.82 vs 29.19). Gross margin: GMTAS leads (20.91% vs 14.39%). EBITDA margin (annual): GMTAS leads (163.83% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): GMTAS leads (−2.04% vs −6.14%). Return on assets: GMTAS leads (−2.30% vs −7.29%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GMTAS or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, GMTAS trades at the lower multiple (3.23 vs 12.48).
Which is more profitable, GMTAS or KENT?
Annual net margin is −2.04% for GMTAS and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is −2.83% for GMTAS and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, GMTAS or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 17.80 for GMTAS and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is — for GMTAS and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.