GMTAS vs GUBRF Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GMTAS and GUBRF side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GMTAS | GUBRF | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 48.30 | 437.50 | 10.97 |
| Daily change | −2.62% | −4.48% | −4.15% |
| Market cap | TRY 14.5B | TRY 146.1B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | — | 19.22 | 13.61 |
| P/B | 3.23 | 3.89 | 0.89 |
| Return on equity | −2.83% | 23.87% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 86.78% | 20.28% | 32.02% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GMTAS vs GUBRF comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GMTAS (Gimat Magazacilik) and GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:20. Of the 12 metrics compared, GMTAS leads in 5 and GUBRF leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: GMTAS leads (−2.62% vs −4.48%). Market cap: GUBRF leads (TRY 146.1B vs TRY 14.5B). P/B: GMTAS leads (3.23 vs 3.89). EV/Sales: GUBRF leads (3.90 vs 29.19). Gross margin: GUBRF leads (26.69% vs 20.91%). EBITDA margin (annual): GMTAS leads (163.83% vs 22.84%). Net margin (annual): GUBRF leads (13.44% vs −2.04%). Return on assets: GUBRF leads (11.35% vs −2.30%).
Frequently asked questions
Is GMTAS or GUBRF cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 19.22); by P/B, GMTAS trades at the lower multiple (3.23 vs 3.89).
Which is more profitable, GMTAS or GUBRF?
Annual net margin is −2.04% for GMTAS and 13.44% for GUBRF; return on equity is −2.83% for GMTAS and 23.87% for GUBRF.
Which is more leveraged, GMTAS or GUBRF?
The leverage ratio is 17.80 for GMTAS and 41.50 for GUBRF; net debt/EBITDA is — for GMTAS and −0.39 for GUBRF. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.