GLRYH vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GLRYH and KENT side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GLRYH | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.74 | 281.00 | 7.28 |
| Daily change | −4.40% | −3.10% | −5.09% |
| Market cap | TRY 1B | TRY 92.7B | TRY 563.4M |
| P/E | 2.32 | — | 9.33 |
| P/B | 0.19 | 12.48 | 0.66 |
| Return on equity | 9.45% | −13.03% | −5.28% |
| Free float | 79.42% | 0.54% | 79.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GLRYH vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:58. Of the 14 metrics compared, GLRYH leads in 9 and KENT leads in 5.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (−3.10% vs −4.40%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 92.7B vs TRY 1B). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: KENT leads (11.82 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 14.39%). EBITDA margin (annual): KENT leads (5.65% vs −42.31%). Net margin (annual): GLRYH leads (41.94% vs −6.14%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GLRYH or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (2.32 vs —); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (0.19 vs 12.48).
Which is more profitable, GLRYH or KENT?
Annual net margin is 41.94% for GLRYH and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is 9.45% for GLRYH and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, GLRYH or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 37.89 for GLRYH and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is — for GLRYH and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.