KENT vs HLGYO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KENT and HLGYO side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KENT | HLGYO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 292.50 | 3.88 | 10.98 |
| Daily change | 0.86% | −5.13% | −4.07% |
| Market cap | TRY 96.5B | TRY 14.9B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | — | 1.15 | 13.61 |
| P/B | 12.48 | 0.24 | 0.89 |
| Dividend yield | — | 9.99% | 1.23% |
| Return on equity | −13.03% | 25.11% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 0.54% | 18.35% | 32.02% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KENT vs HLGYO comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KENT (Kent Gida) and HLGYO (Halk GMYO) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 10:00. Of the 15 metrics compared, KENT leads in 5 and HLGYO leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.86% vs −5.13%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 96.5B vs TRY 14.9B). P/B: HLGYO leads (0.24 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: HLGYO leads (11.30 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: HLGYO leads (6.68 vs 11.82). Gross margin: HLGYO leads (24.47% vs 14.39%). EBITDA margin (annual): HLGYO leads (17.29% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): HLGYO leads (80.55% vs −6.14%).
Frequently asked questions
Is KENT or HLGYO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 1.15); by P/B, HLGYO trades at the lower multiple (12.48 vs 0.24).
Which is more profitable, KENT or HLGYO?
Annual net margin is −6.14% for KENT and 80.55% for HLGYO; return on equity is −13.03% for KENT and 25.11% for HLGYO.
Which is more leveraged, KENT or HLGYO?
The leverage ratio is 43.40 for KENT and 36.71 for HLGYO; net debt/EBITDA is 0.00 for KENT and 5.67 for HLGYO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.