GLRMK vs GARFA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GLRMK and GARFA side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GLRMK | GARFA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 140.40 | 22.46 | 15.54 |
| Daily change | −4.36% | −5.55% | −5.88% |
| Market cap | TRY 45.3B | TRY 8.9B | TRY 5.5B |
| P/E | 12.19 | 3.60 | 24.91 |
| P/B | 1.67 | 1.40 | 1.01 |
| Return on equity | 17.35% | 45.56% | 1.06% |
| Free float | 25.53% | 8.37% | 26.74% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GLRMK vs GARFA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GLRMK (Gulermak Agir Sanayi) and GARFA (Garanti Faktoring) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:48. Of the 7 metrics compared, GLRMK leads in 2 and GARFA leads in 5.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRMK leads (−4.36% vs −5.55%). Market cap: GLRMK leads (TRY 45.3B vs TRY 8.9B). P/E: GARFA leads (3.60 vs 12.19). P/B: GARFA leads (1.40 vs 1.67). Net margin (annual): GARFA leads (18.74% vs 8.37%). Return on assets: GARFA leads (7.06% vs 5.68%). Return on equity: GARFA leads (45.56% vs 17.35%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GLRMK or GARFA cheaper?
By P/E, GARFA is cheaper (12.19 vs 3.60); by P/B, GARFA trades at the lower multiple (1.67 vs 1.40).
Which is more profitable, GLRMK or GARFA?
Annual net margin is 8.37% for GLRMK and 18.74% for GARFA; return on equity is 17.35% for GLRMK and 45.56% for GARFA.
Which is more leveraged, GLRMK or GARFA?
The leverage ratio is 64.52 for GLRMK and — for GARFA; net debt/EBITDA is −0.07 for GLRMK and — for GARFA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.