GLRMK vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GLRMK and FROTO side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GLRMK | FROTO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 139.90 | 75.05 | 15.63 |
| Daily change | −4.70% | −2.28% | −6.28% |
| Market cap | TRY 45.1B | TRY 263.4B | TRY 5.6B |
| P/E | 12.19 | 8.12 | 25.12 |
| P/B | 1.67 | 1.50 | 0.99 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.36% | 1.87% |
| Return on equity | 17.35% | 19.65% | 1.06% |
| Free float | 25.53% | 17.66% | 26.74% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GLRMK vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GLRMK (Gulermak Agir Sanayi) and FROTO (Ford Otosan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 13:44. Of the 16 metrics compared, GLRMK leads in 8 and FROTO leads in 8.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.28% vs −4.70%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 263.4B vs TRY 45.1B). P/E: FROTO leads (8.12 vs 12.19). P/B: FROTO leads (1.50 vs 1.67). EV/EBITDA: GLRMK leads (8.02 vs 9.18). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 2.14). Gross margin: GLRMK leads (13.29% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): GLRMK leads (12.63% vs 6.30%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GLRMK or FROTO cheaper?
By P/E, FROTO is cheaper (12.19 vs 8.12); by P/B, FROTO trades at the lower multiple (1.67 vs 1.50).
Which is more profitable, GLRMK or FROTO?
Annual net margin is 8.37% for GLRMK and 4.28% for FROTO; return on equity is 17.35% for GLRMK and 19.65% for FROTO.
Which is more leveraged, GLRMK or FROTO?
The leverage ratio is 64.52 for GLRMK and 63.37 for FROTO; net debt/EBITDA is −0.07 for GLRMK and 2.29 for FROTO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.