GARFA vs NTHOL Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GARFA and NTHOL side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GARFA | NTHOL | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 22.70 | 38.32 | 10.49 |
| Daily change | −4.54% | 1.97% | −4.10% |
| Market cap | TRY 9B | TRY 19.2B | TRY 7.8B |
| P/E | 3.60 | 15.44 | 3.40 |
| P/B | 1.40 | 0.21 | 0.90 |
| Return on equity | 45.56% | 1.56% | 33.74% |
| Free float | 8.37% | 20.36% | 31.44% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GARFA vs NTHOL Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GARFA (Garanti Faktoring) and NTHOL (Net Holding) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 16:54. Of the 7 metrics compared, GARFA leads in 4 and NTHOL leads in 3.
Highlights: Daily change: NTHOL leads (1.97% vs −4.54%). Market cap: NTHOL leads (TRY 19.2B vs TRY 9B). P/E: GARFA leads (3.60 vs 15.44). P/B: NTHOL leads (0.21 vs 1.40). Net margin (annual): GARFA leads (18.74% vs 5.00%). Return on assets: GARFA leads (7.06% vs 0.99%). Return on equity: GARFA leads (45.56% vs 1.56%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GARFA or NTHOL cheaper?
By P/E, GARFA is cheaper (3.60 vs 15.44); by P/B, NTHOL trades at the lower multiple (1.40 vs 0.21).
Which is more profitable, GARFA or NTHOL?
Annual net margin is 18.74% for GARFA and 5.00% for NTHOL; return on equity is 45.56% for GARFA and 1.56% for NTHOL.
Which is more leveraged, GARFA or NTHOL?
The leverage ratio is — for GARFA and 31.18 for NTHOL; net debt/EBITDA is — for GARFA and 0.91 for NTHOL. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.