GARFA vs GLRMK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GARFA and GLRMK side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GARFA | GLRMK | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 22.46 | 139.80 | 10.42 |
| Daily change | −5.55% | −4.77% | −5.48% |
| Market cap | TRY 8.9B | TRY 45.1B | TRY 7.6B |
| P/E | 3.60 | 12.19 | 3.40 |
| P/B | 1.40 | 1.67 | 0.89 |
| Return on equity | 45.56% | 17.35% | 33.74% |
| Free float | 8.37% | 25.53% | 31.44% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GARFA vs GLRMK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GARFA (Garanti Faktoring) and GLRMK (Gulermak Agir Sanayi) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:01. Of the 7 metrics compared, GARFA leads in 5 and GLRMK leads in 2.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRMK leads (−4.77% vs −5.55%). Market cap: GLRMK leads (TRY 45.1B vs TRY 8.9B). P/E: GARFA leads (3.60 vs 12.19). P/B: GARFA leads (1.40 vs 1.67). Net margin (annual): GARFA leads (18.74% vs 8.37%). Return on assets: GARFA leads (7.06% vs 5.68%). Return on equity: GARFA leads (45.56% vs 17.35%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GARFA or GLRMK cheaper?
By P/E, GARFA is cheaper (3.60 vs 12.19); by P/B, GARFA trades at the lower multiple (1.40 vs 1.67).
Which is more profitable, GARFA or GLRMK?
Annual net margin is 18.74% for GARFA and 8.37% for GLRMK; return on equity is 45.56% for GARFA and 17.35% for GLRMK.
Which is more leveraged, GARFA or GLRMK?
The leverage ratio is — for GARFA and 64.52 for GLRMK; net debt/EBITDA is — for GARFA and −0.07 for GLRMK. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.