FMIZP vs GUBRF Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FMIZP and GUBRF side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FMIZP | GUBRF | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 272.75 | 437.50 | 20.71 |
| Daily change | −1.53% | −4.48% | −4.10% |
| Market cap | TRY 3.9B | TRY 146.1B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | 28.02 | 19.22 | 16.24 |
| P/B | 5.55 | 3.89 | 1.17 |
| Dividend yield | 1.60% | — | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | 20.90% | 23.87% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 22.20% | 20.28% | 34.94% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FMIZP vs GUBRF comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FMIZP (F-M Izmit Piston) and GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:24. Of the 16 metrics compared, FMIZP leads in 8 and GUBRF leads in 8.
Highlights: Daily change: FMIZP leads (−1.53% vs −4.48%). Market cap: GUBRF leads (TRY 146.1B vs TRY 3.9B). P/E: GUBRF leads (19.22 vs 28.02). P/B: GUBRF leads (3.89 vs 5.55). EV/EBITDA: GUBRF leads (11.70 vs 25.47). EV/Sales: GUBRF leads (3.90 vs 8.22). Gross margin: GUBRF leads (26.69% vs 24.61%). EBITDA margin (annual): GUBRF leads (22.84% vs 18.80%).
Frequently asked questions
Is FMIZP or GUBRF cheaper?
By P/E, GUBRF is cheaper (28.02 vs 19.22); by P/B, GUBRF trades at the lower multiple (5.55 vs 3.89).
Which is more profitable, FMIZP or GUBRF?
Annual net margin is 18.62% for FMIZP and 13.44% for GUBRF; return on equity is 20.90% for FMIZP and 23.87% for GUBRF.
Which is more leveraged, FMIZP or GUBRF?
The leverage ratio is 16.28 for FMIZP and 41.50 for GUBRF; net debt/EBITDA is −3.05 for FMIZP and −0.39 for GUBRF. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.