ETYAT vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of ETYAT and KENT side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | ETYAT | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 10.60 | 292.50 | 7.48 |
| Daily change | 5.37% | 0.86% | −3.58% |
| Market cap | TRY 636M | TRY 96.5B | TRY 574.5M |
| P/B | 8.17 | 12.48 | 0.73 |
| Return on equity | −15.08% | −13.03% | −5.28% |
| Free float | 92.00% | 0.54% | 79.42% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the ETYAT vs KENT comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of ETYAT (Euro Trend Yat. Ort.) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:41. Of the 14 metrics compared, ETYAT leads in 8 and KENT leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: ETYAT leads (5.37% vs 0.86%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 96.5B vs TRY 636M). P/B: ETYAT leads (8.17 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: ETYAT leads (72.90 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: KENT leads (11.82 vs 17.84). Gross margin: ETYAT leads (47.32% vs 14.39%). EBITDA margin (annual): ETYAT leads (11.52% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): KENT leads (−6.14% vs −16.75%).
Frequently asked questions
Is ETYAT or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, ETYAT trades at the lower multiple (8.17 vs 12.48).
Which is more profitable, ETYAT or KENT?
Annual net margin is −16.75% for ETYAT and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is −15.08% for ETYAT and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, ETYAT or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 10.41 for ETYAT and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is −9.18 for ETYAT and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.