ERSU vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of ERSU and FROTO side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ERSU | FROTO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 12.98 | 75.00 | 10.90 |
| Daily change | −6.62% | −2.34% | −5.40% |
| Market cap | TRY 467.3M | TRY 263.2B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | — | 8.12 | 13.64 |
| P/B | 1.00 | 1.50 | 0.86 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.36% | 1.23% |
| Return on equity | −7.68% | 19.65% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 64.97% | 17.66% | 32.02% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ERSU vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of ERSU (Ersu Gida) and FROTO (Ford Otosan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 13:56. Of the 14 metrics compared, ERSU leads in 5 and FROTO leads in 9.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.34% vs −6.62%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 263.2B vs TRY 467.3M). P/B: ERSU leads (1.00 vs 1.50). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs −81.07). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 16.73). Gross margin: FROTO leads (6.87% vs −41.86%). EBITDA margin (annual): FROTO leads (6.30% vs −1.84%). Net margin (annual): FROTO leads (4.28% vs −34.94%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ERSU or FROTO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 8.12); by P/B, ERSU trades at the lower multiple (1.00 vs 1.50).
Which is more profitable, ERSU or FROTO?
Annual net margin is −34.94% for ERSU and 4.28% for FROTO; return on equity is −7.68% for ERSU and 19.65% for FROTO.
Which is more leveraged, ERSU or FROTO?
The leverage ratio is 34.47 for ERSU and 63.37 for FROTO; net debt/EBITDA is — for ERSU and 2.29 for FROTO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.