CRDFA vs MMCAS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CRDFA and MMCAS side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | CRDFA | MMCAS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 8.98 | 15.53 | 10.50 |
| Daily change | −9.93% | −7.39% | −4.07% |
| Market cap | TRY 2.7B | TRY 207.1M | TRY 7.8B |
| P/E | 11.80 | — | 3.60 |
| P/B | 8.61 | 17.01 | 0.95 |
| Return on equity | 111.09% | −21.56% | 33.74% |
| Free float | 51.94% | 92.92% | 31.44% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the CRDFA vs MMCAS comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CRDFA (Creditwest Faktoring) and MMCAS (Mmc San. ve Tic. Yat.) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:15. Of the 6 metrics compared, CRDFA leads in 5 and MMCAS leads in 1.
Highlights: Daily change: MMCAS leads (−7.39% vs −9.93%). Market cap: CRDFA leads (TRY 2.7B vs TRY 207.1M). P/B: CRDFA leads (8.61 vs 17.01). Net margin (annual): CRDFA leads (306.98% vs −0.06%). Return on assets: CRDFA leads (53.98% vs −9.99%). Return on equity: CRDFA leads (111.09% vs −21.56%).
Frequently asked questions
Is CRDFA or MMCAS cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (11.80 vs —); by P/B, CRDFA trades at the lower multiple (8.61 vs 17.01).
Which is more profitable, CRDFA or MMCAS?
Annual net margin is 306.98% for CRDFA and −0.06% for MMCAS; return on equity is 111.09% for CRDFA and −21.56% for MMCAS.
Which is more leveraged, CRDFA or MMCAS?
The leverage ratio is — for CRDFA and 31.20 for MMCAS; net debt/EBITDA is — for CRDFA and — for MMCAS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.