MMCAS vs QNBFK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of MMCAS and QNBFK side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | MMCAS | QNBFK | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 15.53 | 36.78 | 27.66 |
| Daily change | −7.39% | 0.49% | −4.83% |
| Market cap | TRY 207.1M | TRY 91.9B | TRY 8B |
| P/E | — | 43.08 | 12.39 |
| P/B | 17.01 | 11.22 | 1.36 |
| Return on equity | −21.56% | 30.06% | 6.37% |
| Free float | 92.92% | 0.60% | 28.26% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the MMCAS vs QNBFK comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of MMCAS (Mmc San. ve Tic. Yat.) and QNBFK (Qnb Finansal Kiralama) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 10:00. Of the 6 metrics compared, MMCAS leads in 0 and QNBFK leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: QNBFK leads (0.49% vs −7.39%). Market cap: QNBFK leads (TRY 91.9B vs TRY 207.1M). P/B: QNBFK leads (11.22 vs 17.01). Net margin (annual): QNBFK leads (189.09% vs −0.06%). Return on assets: QNBFK leads (3.77% vs −9.99%). Return on equity: QNBFK leads (30.06% vs −21.56%).
Frequently asked questions
Is MMCAS or QNBFK cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 43.08); by P/B, QNBFK trades at the lower multiple (17.01 vs 11.22).
Which is more profitable, MMCAS or QNBFK?
Annual net margin is −0.06% for MMCAS and 189.09% for QNBFK; return on equity is −21.56% for MMCAS and 30.06% for QNBFK.
Which is more leveraged, MMCAS or QNBFK?
The leverage ratio is 31.20 for MMCAS and — for QNBFK; net debt/EBITDA is — for MMCAS and — for QNBFK. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.