COSMO vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of COSMO and KENT side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | COSMO | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 83.05 | 292.50 | 7.48 |
| Daily change | −6.32% | 0.86% | −3.58% |
| Market cap | TRY 574.5M | TRY 96.5B | TRY 574.5M |
| P/B | 4.31 | 12.48 | 0.73 |
| Return on equity | −37.88% | −13.03% | −5.28% |
| Free float | 65.58% | 0.54% | 79.42% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the COSMO vs KENT comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of COSMO (Cosmos Yat. Holding) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:41. Of the 15 metrics compared, COSMO leads in 7 and KENT leads in 8.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.86% vs −6.32%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 96.5B vs TRY 574.5M). P/B: COSMO leads (4.31 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: COSMO leads (9.65 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: COSMO leads (2.65 vs 11.82). Gross margin: COSMO leads (25.26% vs 14.39%). EBITDA margin (annual): COSMO leads (11.63% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): KENT leads (−6.14% vs −6.46%).
Frequently asked questions
Is COSMO or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, COSMO trades at the lower multiple (4.31 vs 12.48).
Which is more profitable, COSMO or KENT?
Annual net margin is −6.46% for COSMO and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is −37.88% for COSMO and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, COSMO or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 53.19 for COSMO and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is 0.42 for COSMO and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.