BORLS vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of BORLS and GLRYH side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | BORLS | GLRYH | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.72 | 1.78 | 20.52 |
| Daily change | −9.95% | −2.20% | −4.18% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.2B | TRY 1.1B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | — | 2.32 | 16.24 |
| P/B | −1.05 | 0.19 | 1.17 |
| Return on equity | 4,481.90% | 9.45% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 54.13% | 79.42% | 34.94% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the BORLS vs GLRYH comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of BORLS (Borlease Otomotiv) and GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:15. Of the 14 metrics compared, BORLS leads in 4 and GLRYH leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRYH leads (−2.20% vs −9.95%). Market cap: BORLS leads (TRY 1.2B vs TRY 1.1B). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs −1.05). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 7.13). EV/Sales: BORLS leads (5.05 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 18.61%). EBITDA margin (annual): BORLS leads (28.58% vs −42.31%). Net margin (annual): GLRYH leads (41.94% vs −56.31%).
Frequently asked questions
Is BORLS or GLRYH cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 2.32); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (−1.05 vs 0.19).
Which is more profitable, BORLS or GLRYH?
Annual net margin is −56.31% for BORLS and 41.94% for GLRYH; return on equity is 4,481.90% for BORLS and 9.45% for GLRYH.
Which is more leveraged, BORLS or GLRYH?
The leverage ratio is 109.71 for BORLS and 37.89 for GLRYH; net debt/EBITDA is 6.21 for BORLS and — for GLRYH. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.