BARMA vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of BARMA and TUPRS side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | BARMA | TUPRS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 6.90 | 399.50 | 16.60 |
| Daily change | −7.13% | −1.60% | −4.50% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.8B | TRY 769.8B | TRY 2.7B |
| P/E | — | 10.75 | 6.90 |
| P/B | 0.39 | 1.72 | 1.28 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.00% | 2.52% |
| Return on equity | −1.04% | 18.20% | −1.04% |
| Free float | 35.65% | 49.42% | 34.99% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the BARMA vs TUPRS comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of BARMA (Barem Ambalaj) and TUPRS (Tüpraş) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 10:00. Of the 15 metrics compared, BARMA leads in 3 and TUPRS leads in 12.
Highlights: Daily change: TUPRS leads (−1.60% vs −7.13%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 769.8B vs TRY 1.8B). P/B: BARMA leads (0.39 vs 1.72). EV/EBITDA: TUPRS leads (6.43 vs 15.80). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.98 vs 3.61). Gross margin: BARMA leads (13.25% vs 12.69%). EBITDA margin (annual): BARMA leads (16.73% vs 10.32%). Net margin (annual): TUPRS leads (7.07% vs −1.04%).
Frequently asked questions
Is BARMA or TUPRS cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 10.75); by P/B, BARMA trades at the lower multiple (0.39 vs 1.72).
Which is more profitable, BARMA or TUPRS?
Annual net margin is −1.04% for BARMA and 7.07% for TUPRS; return on equity is −1.04% for BARMA and 18.20% for TUPRS.
Which is more leveraged, BARMA or TUPRS?
The leverage ratio is 68.28 for BARMA and 46.13 for TUPRS; net debt/EBITDA is 9.76 for BARMA and −1.23 for TUPRS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.