BARMA vs ALKA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of BARMA and ALKA side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | BARMA | ALKA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 6.90 | 6.16 | 16.18 |
| Daily change | −7.13% | −4.94% | −4.37% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.8B | TRY 4.5B | TRY 2.7B |
| P/B | 0.39 | 1.97 | 1.28 |
| Return on equity | −1.04% | −6.06% | −1.04% |
| Free float | 35.65% | 18.96% | 34.99% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the BARMA vs ALKA comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of BARMA (Barem Ambalaj) and ALKA (Alkim Kağıt) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 10:00. Of the 15 metrics compared, BARMA leads in 7 and ALKA leads in 8.
Highlights: Daily change: ALKA leads (−4.94% vs −7.13%). Market cap: ALKA leads (TRY 4.5B vs TRY 1.8B). P/B: BARMA leads (0.39 vs 1.97). EV/EBITDA: BARMA leads (15.80 vs 40.64). EV/Sales: ALKA leads (3.28 vs 3.61). Gross margin: BARMA leads (13.25% vs 7.28%). EBITDA margin (annual): BARMA leads (16.73% vs 6.31%). Net margin (annual): BARMA leads (−1.04% vs −4.91%).
Frequently asked questions
Is BARMA or ALKA cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, BARMA trades at the lower multiple (0.39 vs 1.97).
Which is more profitable, BARMA or ALKA?
Annual net margin is −1.04% for BARMA and −4.91% for ALKA; return on equity is −1.04% for BARMA and −6.06% for ALKA.
Which is more leveraged, BARMA or ALKA?
The leverage ratio is 68.28 for BARMA and 44.44 for ALKA; net debt/EBITDA is 9.76 for BARMA and 2.89 for ALKA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.