BARMA vs GUBRF Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of BARMA and GUBRF side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | BARMA | GUBRF | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 6.90 | 438.50 | 16.21 |
| Daily change | −7.13% | −4.26% | −3.76% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.8B | TRY 146.5B | TRY 2.8B |
| P/E | — | 19.22 | 6.90 |
| P/B | 0.39 | 3.89 | 1.28 |
| Return on equity | −1.04% | 23.87% | −1.04% |
| Free float | 35.65% | 20.28% | 34.99% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the BARMA vs GUBRF comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of BARMA (Barem Ambalaj) and GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 10:00. Of the 15 metrics compared, BARMA leads in 2 and GUBRF leads in 13.
Highlights: Daily change: GUBRF leads (−4.26% vs −7.13%). Market cap: GUBRF leads (TRY 146.5B vs TRY 1.8B). P/B: BARMA leads (0.39 vs 3.89). EV/EBITDA: GUBRF leads (11.70 vs 15.80). EV/Sales: BARMA leads (3.61 vs 3.90). Gross margin: GUBRF leads (26.69% vs 13.25%). EBITDA margin (annual): GUBRF leads (22.84% vs 16.73%). Net margin (annual): GUBRF leads (13.44% vs −1.04%).
Frequently asked questions
Is BARMA or GUBRF cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 19.22); by P/B, BARMA trades at the lower multiple (0.39 vs 3.89).
Which is more profitable, BARMA or GUBRF?
Annual net margin is −1.04% for BARMA and 13.44% for GUBRF; return on equity is −1.04% for BARMA and 23.87% for GUBRF.
Which is more leveraged, BARMA or GUBRF?
The leverage ratio is 68.28 for BARMA and 41.50 for GUBRF; net debt/EBITDA is 9.76 for BARMA and −0.39 for GUBRF. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.