BARMA vs EUKYO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of BARMA and EUKYO side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | BARMA | EUKYO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 6.90 | 9.24 | 16.25 |
| Daily change | −7.13% | −4.55% | −4.56% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.8B | TRY 554.4M | TRY 2.7B |
| P/B | 0.39 | 7.00 | 1.28 |
| Return on equity | −1.04% | −23.77% | −1.04% |
| Free float | 35.65% | 99.45% | 34.99% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the BARMA vs EUKYO comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of BARMA (Barem Ambalaj) and EUKYO (Euro Kapital Yat. Ort.) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 10:00. Of the 14 metrics compared, BARMA leads in 8 and EUKYO leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: EUKYO leads (−4.55% vs −7.13%). Market cap: BARMA leads (TRY 1.8B vs TRY 554.4M). P/B: BARMA leads (0.39 vs 7.00). EV/EBITDA: BARMA leads (15.80 vs 78.42). EV/Sales: BARMA leads (3.61 vs 16.56). Gross margin: EUKYO leads (49.68% vs 13.25%). EBITDA margin (annual): BARMA leads (16.73% vs 9.98%). Net margin (annual): BARMA leads (−1.04% vs −29.47%).
Frequently asked questions
Is BARMA or EUKYO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, BARMA trades at the lower multiple (0.39 vs 7.00).
Which is more profitable, BARMA or EUKYO?
Annual net margin is −1.04% for BARMA and −29.47% for EUKYO; return on equity is −1.04% for BARMA and −23.77% for EUKYO.
Which is more leveraged, BARMA or EUKYO?
The leverage ratio is 68.28 for BARMA and 6.99 for EUKYO; net debt/EBITDA is 9.76 for BARMA and −11.52 for EUKYO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.