BAHKM vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of BAHKM and TUPRS side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BAHKM | TUPRS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 152.70 | 354.00 | 12.46 |
| Daily change | 4.95% | 1.58% | 1.61% |
| Market cap | TRY 8.4B | TRY 682.1B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | — | 5.18 | 16.41 |
| P/B | 5.46 | 1.28 | 0.95 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.78% | 0.91% |
| Return on equity | −21.85% | 26.59% | 0.48% |
| Free float | 27.02% | 49.04% | 35.90% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BAHKM vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of BAHKM (Bahadir Kimya) and TUPRS (Tüpraş) side by side as of Nov 12, 2026, 12:19. Of the 13 metrics compared, BAHKM leads in 6 and TUPRS leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: BAHKM leads (4.95% vs 1.58%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 682.1B vs TRY 8.4B). P/B: TUPRS leads (1.28 vs 5.46). EV/EBITDA: TUPRS leads (2.81 vs 80.08). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.40 vs 13.26). Gross margin: BAHKM leads (24.27% vs 15.56%). EBITDA margin (annual): BAHKM leads (147.91% vs 13.68%). Net margin (annual): TUPRS leads (10.56% vs −47.80%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is BAHKM or TUPRS cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 5.18); by P/B, TUPRS trades at the lower multiple (5.46 vs 1.28).
Which is more profitable, BAHKM or TUPRS?
Annual net margin is −47.80% for BAHKM and 10.56% for TUPRS; return on equity is −21.85% for BAHKM and 26.59% for TUPRS.
Which is more leveraged, BAHKM or TUPRS?
The leverage ratio is 17.81 for BAHKM and 45.39 for TUPRS; net debt/EBITDA is — for BAHKM and −1.22 for TUPRS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.