BAHKM vs GUBRF Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of BAHKM and GUBRF side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BAHKM | GUBRF | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 153.30 | 284.75 | 12.37 |
| Daily change | 5.36% | 1.52% | 1.72% |
| Market cap | TRY 8.4B | TRY 95.1B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | — | 10.65 | 16.41 |
| P/B | 5.46 | 2.21 | 0.95 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.12% | 0.91% |
| Return on equity | −21.85% | 22.15% | 0.48% |
| Free float | 27.02% | 19.80% | 35.90% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BAHKM vs GUBRF Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of BAHKM (Bahadir Kimya) and GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) side by side as of Nov 12, 2026, 12:30. Of the 13 metrics compared, BAHKM leads in 6 and GUBRF leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: BAHKM leads (5.36% vs 1.52%). Market cap: GUBRF leads (TRY 95.1B vs TRY 8.4B). P/B: GUBRF leads (2.21 vs 5.46). EV/EBITDA: GUBRF leads (7.36 vs 80.08). EV/Sales: GUBRF leads (1.52 vs 13.26). Gross margin: BAHKM leads (24.27% vs 24.06%). EBITDA margin (annual): BAHKM leads (147.91% vs 19.34%). Net margin (annual): GUBRF leads (14.01% vs −47.80%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is BAHKM or GUBRF cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 10.65); by P/B, GUBRF trades at the lower multiple (5.46 vs 2.21).
Which is more profitable, BAHKM or GUBRF?
Annual net margin is −47.80% for BAHKM and 14.01% for GUBRF; return on equity is −21.85% for BAHKM and 22.15% for GUBRF.
Which is more leveraged, BAHKM or GUBRF?
The leverage ratio is 17.81 for BAHKM and 43.29 for GUBRF; net debt/EBITDA is — for BAHKM and −0.45 for GUBRF. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.