BAGFS vs ECILC Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of BAGFS and ECILC side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BAGFS | ECILC | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 21.54 | 63.60 | 18.72 |
| Daily change | −7.39% | −7.15% | −6.24% |
| Market cap | TRY 2.9B | TRY 43.6B | TRY 4.3B |
| P/E | 16.36 | — | 17.35 |
| P/B | 0.35 | 0.68 | 1.09 |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | 2.04% | 0.90% |
| Return on equity | 2.42% | −3.08% | 1.78% |
| Free float | 61.17% | 22.02% | 37.21% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BAGFS vs ECILC Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of BAGFS (Bagfas) and ECILC (Eczacıbaşı İlaç) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:15. Of the 16 metrics compared, BAGFS leads in 7 and ECILC leads in 9.
Highlights: Daily change: ECILC leads (−7.15% vs −7.39%). Market cap: ECILC leads (TRY 43.6B vs TRY 2.9B). P/B: BAGFS leads (0.35 vs 0.68). EV/EBITDA: BAGFS leads (8.33 vs 165.19). EV/Sales: BAGFS leads (2.80 vs 9.35). Dividend yield: ECILC leads (2.04% vs 0.44%). Gross margin: ECILC leads (37.83% vs 19.78%). EBITDA margin (annual): BAGFS leads (25.64% vs 11.49%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is BAGFS or ECILC cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (16.36 vs —); by P/B, BAGFS trades at the lower multiple (0.35 vs 0.68).
Which is more profitable, BAGFS or ECILC?
Annual net margin is 4.28% for BAGFS and −20.86% for ECILC; return on equity is 2.42% for BAGFS and −3.08% for ECILC.
Which is more leveraged, BAGFS or ECILC?
The leverage ratio is 45.70 for BAGFS and 18.92 for ECILC; net debt/EBITDA is 5.51 for BAGFS and 1.37 for ECILC. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.