BAGFS vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of BAGFS and TUPRS side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | BAGFS | TUPRS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 21.94 | 399.50 | 18.72 |
| Daily change | −5.67% | −1.60% | −4.79% |
| Market cap | TRY 3B | TRY 769.8B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | 16.36 | 10.75 | 18.20 |
| P/B | 0.35 | 1.72 | 1.14 |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | 4.00% | 0.90% |
| Return on equity | 2.42% | 18.20% | 1.78% |
| Free float | 61.17% | 49.42% | 37.21% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the BAGFS vs TUPRS comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of BAGFS (Bagfas) and TUPRS (Tüpraş) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:18. Of the 17 metrics compared, BAGFS leads in 4 and TUPRS leads in 13.
Highlights: Daily change: TUPRS leads (−1.60% vs −5.67%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 769.8B vs TRY 3B). P/E: TUPRS leads (10.75 vs 16.36). P/B: BAGFS leads (0.35 vs 1.72). EV/EBITDA: TUPRS leads (6.43 vs 8.33). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.98 vs 2.80). Dividend yield: TUPRS leads (4.00% vs 0.44%). Gross margin: BAGFS leads (19.78% vs 12.69%).
Frequently asked questions
Is BAGFS or TUPRS cheaper?
By P/E, TUPRS is cheaper (16.36 vs 10.75); by P/B, BAGFS trades at the lower multiple (0.35 vs 1.72).
Which is more profitable, BAGFS or TUPRS?
Annual net margin is 4.28% for BAGFS and 7.07% for TUPRS; return on equity is 2.42% for BAGFS and 18.20% for TUPRS.
Which is more leveraged, BAGFS or TUPRS?
The leverage ratio is 45.70 for BAGFS and 46.13 for TUPRS; net debt/EBITDA is 5.51 for BAGFS and −1.23 for TUPRS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.