TMU vs ZTG Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of TMU (Azimut Portföy Temkinli Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ZTG (Ziraat Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | TMU | ZTG | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.30% | −0.79% | 0.38% |
| 1 week | 0.62% | −1.31% | 0.25% |
| 1 month | 1.69% | −1.67% | −1.05% |
| 3 months | 7.45% | 9.86% | 6.44% |
| 6 months | 17.74% | 14.75% | 13.81% |
| YTD | 28.24% | 25.05% | 22.40% |
| 1 year | 41.20% | 29.93% | 35.81% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the TMU vs ZTG comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of TMU (Azimut Portföy Temkinli Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ZTG (Ziraat Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, TMU leads in 8 and ZTG leads in 2. TMU is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZTG is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: TMU leads (0.30% vs −0.79%). 1 week: TMU leads (0.62% vs −1.31%). 1 month: TMU leads (1.69% vs −1.67%). 3 months: ZTG leads (9.86% vs 7.45%). 6 months: TMU leads (17.74% vs 14.75%). YTD: TMU leads (28.24% vs 25.05%). 1 year: TMU leads (41.20% vs 29.93%). Size (TRY): TMU leads (38M vs 36.4M). Investors: ZTG leads (1,075 vs 80). Risk: TMU leads (2 vs 5).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, TMU or ZTG?
Year to date TMU returned 28.24% and ZTG returned 25.05%; over the last year TMU returned 41.20% and ZTG returned 29.93%. Over the last month TMU returned 1.69% and ZTG returned −1.67%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, TMU or ZTG?
As of September 28, 2026, TMU has a size of TRY 38M with 80 investors, while ZTG has a size of TRY 36.4M with 1,075 investors. TMU leads in size and ZTG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of TMU and ZTG mean?
The CMB risk score of TMU is 2 out of 7 and that of ZTG is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.