Yatırımcı.AI

SGT vs SVB Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of SGT (Garanti Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and SVB (Strateji Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) side by side.

SGTSVB
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

SGT vs SVB Fund Comparison
MetricSGTSVBCategory median
Today (est.)—−2.69%−1.59%
Daily−0.00%0.31%0.32%
1 week3.03%−0.81%0.42%
1 month3.03%−7.12%−1.48%
3 months20.23%−6.07%4.48%
6 months51.22%0.87%14.82%
YTD53.95%9.65%25.33%
1 year53.40%16.82%35.72%
3 years—136.91%161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 18:13.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the SGT vs SVB Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of SGT (Garanti Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and SVB (Strateji Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, SGT leads in 8 and SVB leads in 1. SGT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SVB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Strateji Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: SVB leads (0.31% vs 0.00%). 1 week: SGT leads (3.03% vs −0.81%). 1 month: SGT leads (3.03% vs −7.12%). 3 months: SGT leads (20.23% vs −6.07%). 6 months: SGT leads (51.22% vs 0.87%). YTD: SGT leads (53.95% vs 9.65%). 1 year: SGT leads (53.40% vs 16.82%). Size (TRY): SGT leads (192.5M vs 188.2M). Investors: SGT leads (2,641 vs 1,110).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date SGT returned 53.95% and SVB returned 9.65%; over the last year SGT returned 53.40% and SVB returned 16.82%. Over the last month SGT returned 3.03% and SVB returned −7.12%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, SGT has a size of TRY 192.5M with 2,641 investors, while SVB has a size of TRY 188.2M with 1,110 investors. SGT leads in size and SGT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of SGT is 5 out of 7 and that of SVB is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.