Yatırımcı.AI

RLH vs YSA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of RLH (Rota Portföy Yirminci Serbest Fon) and YSA (Yapı Kredi Portföy Suadiye Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

RLHYSA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

RLH vs YSA Fund Comparison
MetricRLHYSACategory median
Today (est.)−1.27%—−2.71%
Daily−0.07%0.20%0.05%
1 week0.36%0.36%0.44%
1 month2.16%1.06%0.38%
3 months8.54%5.49%3.95%
6 months15.78%11.38%8.45%
YTD39.97%18.35%16.06%
1 year46.99%—20.98%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 22, 2026, 22:16.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the RLH vs YSA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of RLH (Rota Portföy Yirminci Serbest Fon) and YSA (Yapı Kredi Portföy Suadiye Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, RLH leads in 6 and YSA leads in 2. RLH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YSA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: YSA leads (0.20% vs −0.07%). 1 week: RLH leads (0.36% vs 0.36%). 1 month: RLH leads (2.16% vs 1.06%). 3 months: RLH leads (8.54% vs 5.49%). 6 months: RLH leads (15.78% vs 11.38%). YTD: RLH leads (39.97% vs 18.35%). Size (TRY): RLH leads (258.4M vs 246.3M). Investors: YSA leads (248 vs 31).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date RLH returned 39.97% and YSA returned 18.35%; over the last year RLH returned 46.99% and YSA returned —. Over the last month RLH returned 2.16% and YSA returned 1.06%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, RLH has a size of TRY 258.4M with 31 investors, while YSA has a size of TRY 246.3M with 248 investors. RLH leads in size and YSA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of RLH is 2 out of 7 and that of YSA is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.