RGD vs RKC Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of RGD (Re-Pıe Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) and RKC (Rota Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | RGD | RKC | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −1.91% | — | −1.91% |
| Daily | 0.27% | 0.01% | 0.32% |
| 1 week | −0.66% | 0.54% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −5.43% | 0.23% | −1.48% |
| 3 months | 0.58% | 7.19% | 4.48% |
| 6 months | 14.33% | 20.55% | 14.82% |
| YTD | 9.54% | 30.73% | 25.33% |
| 1 year | — | 61.99% | 35.72% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the RGD vs RKC comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of RGD (Re-Pıe Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) and RKC (Rota Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, RGD leads in 1 and RKC leads in 8. RGD is a Variable Fund fund managed by Re-Pıe Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RKC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RGD leads (0.27% vs 0.01%). 1 week: RKC leads (0.54% vs −0.66%). 1 month: RKC leads (0.23% vs −5.43%). 3 months: RKC leads (7.19% vs 0.58%). 6 months: RKC leads (20.55% vs 14.33%). YTD: RKC leads (30.73% vs 9.54%). Size (TRY): RKC leads (26.4M vs 23.8M). Investors: RKC leads (197 vs 98). Risk: RKC leads (3 vs 5).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, RGD or RKC?
Year to date RGD returned 9.54% and RKC returned 30.73%; over the last year RGD returned — and RKC returned 61.99%. Over the last month RGD returned −5.43% and RKC returned 0.23%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, RGD or RKC?
As of September 28, 2026, RGD has a size of TRY 23.8M with 98 investors, while RKC has a size of TRY 26.4M with 197 investors. RKC leads in size and RKC leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of RGD and RKC mean?
The CMB risk score of RGD is 5 out of 7 and that of RKC is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.