ICC vs RGD Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ICC (Teb Portföy Beşinci Değişken Fon) and RGD (Re-Pıe Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | ICC | RGD | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −1.89% | −1.89% |
| Daily | 0.21% | 0.27% | 0.32% |
| 1 week | −0.13% | −0.66% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −1.33% | −5.43% | −1.48% |
| 3 months | 2.14% | 0.58% | 4.48% |
| 6 months | 12.05% | 14.33% | 14.82% |
| YTD | 21.39% | 9.54% | 25.33% |
| 1 year | 27.13% | — | 35.72% |
| 3 years | 161.42% | — | 161.05% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the ICC vs RGD comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ICC (Teb Portföy Beşinci Değişken Fon) and RGD (Re-Pıe Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, ICC leads in 6 and RGD leads in 3. ICC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Teb Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RGD is a Variable Fund fund managed by Re-Pıe Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RGD leads (0.27% vs 0.21%). 1 week: ICC leads (−0.13% vs −0.66%). 1 month: ICC leads (−1.33% vs −5.43%). 3 months: ICC leads (2.14% vs 0.58%). 6 months: RGD leads (14.33% vs 12.05%). YTD: ICC leads (21.39% vs 9.54%). Size (TRY): RGD leads (23.8M vs 23.4M). Investors: ICC leads (267 vs 98). Risk: ICC leads (4 vs 5).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, ICC or RGD?
Year to date ICC returned 21.39% and RGD returned 9.54%; over the last year ICC returned 27.13% and RGD returned —. Over the last month ICC returned −1.33% and RGD returned −5.43%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ICC or RGD?
As of September 28, 2026, ICC has a size of TRY 23.4M with 267 investors, while RGD has a size of TRY 23.8M with 98 investors. RGD leads in size and ICC leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ICC and RGD mean?
The CMB risk score of ICC is 4 out of 7 and that of RGD is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.